Mani Masood“Cybersecurity talent shortage” is a phrase you’ve probably heard. It’s repeated in media, echoed by hiring managers, and cited by frustrated recruiters. But is it true? Industry experts are increasingly questioning the claim. The real issue isn’t a lack of skilled professionals. It’s a problem of misaligned expectations, biased hiring practices, and insufficient organizational support.
Cybersecurity professionals aren’t leaving the field because they lack skill. They’re leaving because of burnout, high stress, and unrealistic job roles. Research shows that 65% of Security Operations Center (SOC) analysts have considered quitting. Meanwhile, job postings demand more than five years of experience for “entry-level” roles. How can the industry expect new talent to thrive under these conditions?
Here’s the reality: cybersecurity is often mischaracterized. Many companies still view it as a branch of IT rather than a discipline focused on risk management and service quality. This limited perspective leads to fear-driven hiring decisions and inflated job descriptions. As a result, qualified candidates are pushed out, and critical positions remain open.
The media plays a role too. Cybersecurity is often portrayed as a high-paying, fast-paced career, but the truth is much more nuanced. Behind the scenes, professionals deal with tedious tasks, complex regulations, and the ever-present threat of attacks. With stress and burnout on the rise, it’s no wonder so many are reconsidering their roles.
Organizations need a wake-up call. To build resilient security teams, they must redefine hiring practices, offer mental health support, and set realistic job expectations. This isn’t just about filling vacancies. It’s about creating a sustainable future for cybersecurity professionals.
Biases in Hiring Practices
Fear, uncertainty, and doubt—known as FUD—shape many cybersecurity hiring decisions. Companies fear the next major breach, so they rush to fill roles with candidates they believe can stop every threat. This reactive approach leads to inflated job descriptions and unrealistic hiring criteria. Cybersecurity gets treated as a hyper-technical problem, rather than a strategic business function that prioritizes risk management and quality control.
One common bias is the over-reliance on traditional IT backgrounds. Hiring managers often believe that only candidates with extensive technical experience or certifications like CISSP are suitable. However, cybersecurity is a multi-disciplinary field. Skills in communication, decision-making, and threat assessment are just as important. By overlooking candidates with diverse skills, organizations sabotage their own efforts to build strong, adaptable teams.
Cognitive biases also create diversity gaps. Research by (ISC)² found that women make up only 24% of the global cybersecurity workforce. Similarly, underrepresented minorities face greater barriers due to rigid qualification requirements. Candidates from non-traditional paths often struggle to gain consideration, even when they meet core competency standards.
These biases aren’t just harmful—they’re costly. Companies with more diverse cybersecurity teams see improved risk mitigation and faster response times. Yet many organizations are stuck filtering out qualified applicants simply because they don’t fit a narrow mold.
Fixing this requires structured interviews and training to combat unconscious bias. Companies like IBM have adopted competency-based hiring models, focusing on proven skills rather than rigid credential requirements. It’s a move that others should follow to strengthen their cybersecurity posture and close talent gaps.
Media Hype and Its Impact
If you rely on media portrayals, you might think cybersecurity professionals live a glamorous life. Movies and TV shows often depict them as lone geniuses cracking complex codes and preventing cyberattacks at the last second. News outlets also play into the hype, highlighting stories of sky-high salaries and exciting work environments. But this portrayal is misleading—and harmful.
In reality, cybersecurity work is anything but glamorous. Many professionals spend their days poring over logs, analyzing alerts, and dealing with false alarms. High-profile incidents may occasionally break the monotony, but the work is often tedious, repetitive, and mentally exhausting. According to a VMware report, 47% of cybersecurity professionals reported severe stress in the past year, with burnout leading many to contemplate leaving the field altogether.
This disconnect between perception and reality can discourage both new entrants and seasoned workers. Newcomers who expect fast-paced excitement quickly realize that much of the job involves painstaking attention to detail. One SOC analyst described it this way: “You feel like you’re constantly chasing ghosts. If you miss one, the consequences could be disastrous, but most of the time, it’s just noise.”
Media-driven misconceptions also create hiring challenges. Organizations may believe that high salaries alone are enough to attract talent, overlooking the need for mental health support and sustainable workloads. This distorted narrative prevents serious discussions about job expectations, work-life balance, and professional development.
To move forward, both the media and the industry need to reset the narrative. Cybersecurity professionals play a critical role in business continuity and risk management. Highlighting their real challenges and contributions—rather than sensationalizing the job—can help attract candidates who are prepared for the work ahead.
The Illusion of Shortage
The cybersecurity industry often cites a significant talent shortage, with reports of 3.5 million unfilled positions globally. In the United States alone, there were approximately 500,000 cybersecurity job openings. However, this perceived shortage may be more about misaligned hiring practices than an actual lack of qualified professionals.
Many companies set rigid requirements for cybersecurity roles, often demanding extensive experience and specific degrees. For instance, a study by the University of California, Berkeley’s Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity found that eliminating mandatory degree requirements and focusing on competencies increased the number of applicants by 56%. This suggests that overly stringent criteria can deter capable candidates.
Biases in hiring further exacerbate the issue. A preference for traditional IT backgrounds and unconscious biases can lead to a lack of diversity and missed opportunities to hire talented individuals from varied backgrounds. By broadening the scope of candidate evaluation and focusing on practical skills, organizations can tap into a wider talent pool and address the so-called shortage more effectively.
Misaligned Job Descriptions and Salary Structures
One of the biggest obstacles in cybersecurity hiring is the job description itself. Many companies post positions labeled “entry-level,” but then demand five to seven years of experience, multiple certifications like CISSP, and proficiency with numerous tools. It’s a recipe for failure. These unrealistic expectations eliminate candidates before they even have a chance to apply.
A survey by (ISC)² found that more than 60% of cybersecurity job listings required over five years of experience. Yet, cybersecurity is a constantly evolving field, and expecting extensive experience from those just starting their careers is counterproductive. Many hiring managers inflate job requirements out of fear—worried that under-qualified candidates could miss crucial threats.
The issue doesn’t end with experience requirements. Salaries for cybersecurity roles are often misaligned with the actual responsibilities. Despite the high stakes involved in threat detection and response, cybersecurity salaries can lag behind comparable IT roles. For example, a 2023 report from PayScale found that cybersecurity professionals earn 16% less than IT infrastructure managers on average, despite facing far more stress and responsibility.
This salary gap sends the wrong message. It suggests that organizations don’t fully value the role cybersecurity plays in business continuity and risk management. Talented professionals often leave for better-compensated positions or avoid the field altogether.
Companies need to simplify their job descriptions and align compensation with reality. By focusing on practical skills, like incident response and risk assessment, and benchmarking salaries against industry standards, businesses can attract—and keep—qualified candidates. Microsoft, for example, revamped its job postings by removing unnecessary requirements, which increased applications and improved diversity within its security teams.
Recruiters and the Erosion of Guidance
Recruiters once served as trusted advisors. They worked closely with hiring managers, offering insights into the job market and helping shape realistic job descriptions. Today, that dynamic has shifted. Many recruiters have become transactional, acting as filters rather than partners. They process hundreds of applicants but rarely push back on hiring managers’ unrealistic demands.
This lack of guidance exacerbates the talent shortage myth. Recruiters may be aware that requiring ten years of experience for a cybersecurity analyst role is impractical. Yet, instead of challenging the criteria, they simply filter out applicants who don’t meet the strict requirements. The result? Empty pipelines, prolonged vacancies, and frustrated hiring teams.
According to a 2023 study by LinkedIn, nearly 70% of recruiters feel pressured to meet quotas rather than advocate for candidates. This transactional approach discourages innovation in hiring. Non-traditional applicants, who may lack certain credentials but possess critical problem-solving and risk management skills, are often overlooked.
However, when recruiters and hiring managers collaborate, the results improve dramatically. Companies like Cisco have implemented proactive recruiting strategies. Their recruiters are trained to challenge unrealistic criteria and educate hiring teams on alternative candidate profiles. As a result, Cisco reduced its average cybersecurity vacancy time by 40% and increased candidate diversity.
Organizations must reinvest in recruiter training. Recruiters need to be empowered to act as strategic advisors, not gatekeepers. Without this shift, the hiring process will remain broken, perpetuating the myth of a talent shortage.
The Reality of Cybersecurity Work
Cybersecurity work is often portrayed as exciting and fast-paced. The truth is far more complicated. Many professionals describe it as relentless, high-pressure, and emotionally draining. Cybersecurity teams face a constant flood of alerts, many of which turn out to be false alarms. Yet, any one of these could signal a real threat. The stress of staying vigilant at all times can take a serious toll.
Burnout is a pervasive problem. A 2024 ISACA survey found that 66% of cybersecurity professionals feel their roles have become significantly more stressful over the past five years. Another study by VMware reported that nearly 47% of cybersecurity professionals experienced severe burnout in the last year alone. In Security Operations Centers (SOCs), where analysts are expected to monitor threats 24/7, the problem is even worse. A staggering 65% of SOC employees have considered leaving their jobs due to stress.
The impact goes beyond individual employees. Burnout reduces productivity, increases errors, and leads to higher turnover. Organizations also bear the financial costs. Studies show that cybersecurity-related burnout costs U.S. businesses around $626 million annually in lost productivity and increased sick leave.
Some companies have begun to address the issue. Google’s cybersecurity teams implemented regular well-being check-ins, resilience training, and access to mental health counseling. These programs led to a significant drop in stress-related turnover and improved employee engagement.
Cybersecurity professionals need more than just high salaries. They need structured support systems to balance the demands of their roles. Without these measures, the cycle of stress and attrition will only worsen.
A Framework for Improvement
The solution to the cybersecurity talent crisis isn’t about finding more talent. It’s about fixing the system. Companies must move away from fear-based hiring and adopt practices that emphasize quality management and service excellence. Structured processes can help businesses hire strategically, retain talent, and improve overall performance. Frameworks like NIST 800-181 (Cybersecurity Workforce Framework) and ISO 27001 provide models that organizations can follow to address these challenges.
Here are actionable steps organizations should implement to address cybersecurity talent shortage:
- Commit to Quality and Excellence
Organizations must adopt structured, bias-aware hiring practices that prioritize fairness and consistency. Fear-driven decisions, such as inflating job requirements to “play it safe,” only hinder recruitment efforts. Interviews should follow competency guidelines rather than vague criteria. By training hiring teams to identify practical skills and reduce biases, companies can hire more effectively. Intel reported a 25% increase in qualified hires from non-traditional backgrounds after implementing these structured processes. - Confront Internal Biases
Many hiring managers still rely on subjective evaluations or “gut feelings” when selecting candidates. This leads to poor diversity and missed opportunities. Implementing structured interviews and unconscious bias training can counteract this. Companies that prioritize competency-based hiring often reduce their time-to-hire and improve candidate diversity. IBM, for example, shortened hiring times by over 30% with this approach. - Set Clear, Realistic Role Expectations
Roles should match business needs, not unattainable wish lists. Frameworks like NIST 800-181 help define core competencies for different job functions. Entry-level roles, for instance, should not require advanced certifications or five years of experience. Clearer expectations also create stronger pipelines for early-career professionals. - Simplify Job Descriptions
Lengthy, overly technical job descriptions drive candidates away. Many applicants, particularly women and minorities, avoid applying if they don’t meet every listed qualification. Companies like Microsoft found that simplifying job descriptions—focusing on practical skills rather than excessive credentials—led to higher application rates and improved diversity. - Align Compensation with Responsibilities
Salaries must reflect the workload and stress of cybersecurity jobs. Many cybersecurity professionals feel undervalued because their compensation does not match the high stakes of their roles. Regular benchmarking against industry standards can prevent turnover and morale issues. Underpaying cybersecurity teams risks costly breaches and prolonged vacancies. - Train Recruiters to Act as Advisors
Recruiters must challenge unrealistic job criteria and guide hiring managers toward effective solutions. Unfortunately, many recruiters have become gatekeepers rather than strategic partners. Training programs can empower them to collaborate with leadership. Cisco’s recruitment team, for example, reduced vacancy times by 40% through proactive advising and pushback on inflated requirements. - Invest in Mental Health and Well-being
High stress and burnout are driving talent away from the cybersecurity field. Organizations must prioritize well-being by providing access to counseling, resilience training, and regular well-being check-ins. Google integrated these programs into their cybersecurity strategy and saw a significant improvement in retention and engagement.
Organizational Responsibility and Support
Cybersecurity professionals can’t defend organizations effectively if they’re stretched thin and unsupported. Yet, many companies fail to provide the resources needed for success. Teams are often understaffed and forced to work long hours in high-pressure environments. The lack of support structures—such as proper staffing, training, and mental health resources—leads to burnout and high turnover.
Research highlights the problem. According to a 2024 ISACA report, 66% of cybersecurity professionals feel that their roles have become more stressful over the past five years. Additionally, 28% of executive-level cybersecurity positions remain vacant, leaving teams without stable leadership. Without proper staffing and leadership, employees feel overwhelmed and directionless, further eroding job satisfaction.
Organizations must take structural support seriously. One key step is ensuring adequate staffing and 24/7 coverage to prevent individual employees from shouldering unsustainable workloads. Investing in automation tools can also reduce the burden by streamlining threat detection and incident response processes.
Mental health initiatives are equally important. Companies that implement regular well-being programs—including counseling services, resilience training, and mental health check-ins—see measurable improvements in employee morale and performance. A major financial firm, for example, reduced cybersecurity turnover by 40% after introducing structured wellness programs for their teams.
Finally, mandatory training and professional development opportunities empower cybersecurity teams to stay ahead of evolving threats. Employees who feel invested in are more engaged and committed to their roles. Organizations that prioritize these support systems are better positioned to build resilient teams capable of handling today’s complex security challenges.
Conclusion
The cybersecurity talent shortage is a myth, perpetuated by flawed hiring practices, unrealistic job descriptions, and sensationalized media portrayals. The real issue lies within organizations themselves. Biases prevent companies from recognizing capable candidates. Fear-driven decisions inflate role expectations. Meanwhile, inadequate compensation and poor support structures push professionals to leave.
Organizations have the power to change this. By committing to quality and excellence, businesses can redefine hiring practices and prioritize employee well-being. Structured, competency-based interviews, realistic job expectations, and mental health initiatives can close perceived talent gaps. Companies like Microsoft, Intel, and Cisco are already seeing success by streamlining their hiring processes and investing in team support.
The stakes are high. With cyber threats increasing daily, businesses can’t afford to lose talented professionals to burnout and dissatisfaction. It’s time to end the cybersecurity talent shortage myth and focus on solutions that foster long-term career sustainability. The future of cybersecurity depends on it.
Liked the article “on cybersecurity talent shortage”
I endeavor to curate stories like this one (cybersecurity talent shortage) on my website. This serves a dual purpose: firstly, to provide a valuable reference for my writing endeavors, and secondly, to share insightful narratives with the wider community. If you like this story, you should check out some of the other stories in the Risk Management or Small Business section.
Expand Your Horizons
Stay informed on the latest Cybersecurity and Technology news at CSO Online.
Mani
